08 02 18	A.S. 99.233.96.153
Sylvie Boucher is a fine example of hitting the ground running upon the foundation of an unforeseen win; cf. the NDP's Peter Stoffer in Nova Scotia--but unlike the maverick Stoffer, she's done so by ‘clinging to the inside’, so to speak. Which *could* be a double-edged sword in case Harper's Quebec balloon deflates. As with Stoffer, I'd give her at least another election or two before offering something more definite...
	08 01 30	John Johnson 24.138.129.52
Sylvie Boucher won this riding in 2006 with very limited resources. 2 years later she is the PM's parliamentary secretary and a good MP, she should win here again.
	07 09 30	Daniel 156.34.69.138
With Bloc support spiralling down in flames and Conservative support growing in Quebec, Sylvie Boucher will almost assuredly be re-elected. Boucher won this riding with very few resources at her disposal in 2006; now that the Tories have a ‘real’ Quebec organizational base to bolster their candidates, Boucher should have little difficulty winning here.
	07 04 13	24.81.18.126
Actually, Nick, Louis-Hébert was the weakest Conservative riding in 2006. Ms. Boucher literally ran her campaign with very little funding, I recall someone saying that she didn't even have signs up. Yet, she still won it. Boucher's incumbency factor, and the fact that she was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister will help her increase her votes. Knowing that the Quebec city area riding is where conservatism fairs quite well, the CPC will really put funding in securing and winning ridings here. CPC hold, easy.
	07 04 05	Nick J Boragina 74.99.228.118
I would not be so quick to declare this Conservative. This is the weakest tory riding in the province, if they lose even one, it is this one.
	07 03 26	Smok Wawelski 69.159.68.252
Sylvie Boucher watched the resuls in '06 come in at another candidate's HQ, since her campaign was not given much of a budget, much less an office. With the consolidation of ADQ/conservative strength in the region she should win again.