|
References:
Population (2016): Population (2011):Private dwellings: Dwellings occupied by usual residents: Land area Population Density |
120784 10573346387 43471 3982.27 km² 30.3/km² |
2015 Results - 2015 Prediction
Reference - Pundits’ Guide (2013 Rep. Order)
|
 | Rona Ambrose ** |
43220 | 70.20% |
 | Travis Dueck |
9586 | 15.60% |
 | Guy Desforges |
6166 | 10.00% |
 | Brendon Greene |
1875 | 3.00% |
 | Ernest Chauvet |
690 | 1.10% |
2011 Results (redistributed)
|
 | |
33789 | 77.49% |
 | |
5657 | 12.97% |
 | |
2385 | 5.47% |
 | |
1742 | 3.99% |
Other | |
35 | 0.08%% |
Component Riding(s) (2003 Representation Order)
|
Edmonton-Spruce Grove
(60.22% of voters in current riding)
2011/2008/2004 Predictions
Reference - Pundits’ Guide
|
Westlock-St. Paul
(34.83% of voters in current riding)
2011/2008/2004 Predictions
Reference - Pundits’ Guide
|
Yellowhead
(4.95% of voters in current riding)
2011/2008/2004 Predictions
Reference - Pundits’ Guide
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | 16/09/19 |
Stevo 165.225.76.154 |
If Scheer crash lands this election, Rona Ambrose will certainly be a frontrunner to replace him. This riding may well be the home of a future Prime Minister. |
 | 15/09/19 |
A.S. 99.225.32.21 |
Actually, there *has* been an illustrious recent Liberal history here, with onetime provincial party leader Nick Taylor calling Westlock-Sturgeon as his home base (and even 2006's 15% seemed an overperforming ghost of that by rural-Alberta standards). Of course, that was all before party support sorted itself much more bluntly along rural-urban lines (even if Notleymania momentarily disrupted that pattern). I still see the final result being closer to Rona's 70% than Dane Lloyd's 77%; if only because the riding isn't getting any less urban (and *maybe* a token PPC factor, though the byelection had CHP as a substitute) |
 | 12/09/19 |
R.O. 24.146.17.200 |
Near Edmonton but was an easy cpc win in the by election a couple years ago , should stay cpc . |
 | 13/06/19 |
Laurence Putnam 96.53.49.70 |
When Trudeaumania 2.0 swept the country, the Liberal candidate here placed second, managing a full 15% of the vote, which was their best result since 2006 (under the former, less favourable boundaries). Let's just say that I feel confident in my prediction. |
 | 06/03/19 |
Sam 86.28.79.130 |
The by-election result indicates the strength of the Conservative vote here, and there is no reason why this won't hold up. |
 | 23/02/19 |
M. Lunn 174.7.100.252 |
Tories got 77% here in the by-election so even if things tighten a bit (which I am not sure they will) they should easily win this one. |
|
|